From c0032378713f83554fe1ed6ce6a2050582cf2184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya_Shlyakhter Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:47:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: separate processes for parallel transfers --- .../comment_17_825334555b637a07f93caf3f519d817d._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/more_extensive_retries_to_mask_transient_failures/comment_17_825334555b637a07f93caf3f519d817d._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/more_extensive_retries_to_mask_transient_failures/comment_17_825334555b637a07f93caf3f519d817d._comment b/doc/todo/more_extensive_retries_to_mask_transient_failures/comment_17_825334555b637a07f93caf3f519d817d._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..96d714c784 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/more_extensive_retries_to_mask_transient_failures/comment_17_825334555b637a07f93caf3f519d817d._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Ilya_Shlyakhter" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/1647044369aa7747829c38b9dcc84df0" + subject="separate processes for parallel transfers" + date="2020-06-12T15:47:28Z" + content=""" +\"separate processes for would of course work, it would add quite a lot of overhead. Especially in places like Annex.Queue\" -- would it be hard to measure how much that overhead is in practice? +"""]]