From bf1002194d38a9af37bc966f9c1c9f6324990780 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:20:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] followup --- ...ment_4_e90ba33f7506745582d18841ae9a9531._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/howto_guarantee_a_single_instance_of_a_special_remote__63__/comment_4_e90ba33f7506745582d18841ae9a9531._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/howto_guarantee_a_single_instance_of_a_special_remote__63__/comment_4_e90ba33f7506745582d18841ae9a9531._comment b/doc/bugs/howto_guarantee_a_single_instance_of_a_special_remote__63__/comment_4_e90ba33f7506745582d18841ae9a9531._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5dcc4d0361 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/howto_guarantee_a_single_instance_of_a_special_remote__63__/comment_4_e90ba33f7506745582d18841ae9a9531._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 4""" + date="2018-04-02T17:13:33Z" + content=""" +Ok so I misunderstood this, it's entirely about -J mode and external +special remote processes. One is started per parallelism level, because +otherwise nothing much would actually be done in parallel. + +You wanted to start only one because reasons, which IIRC from talking +with you were in the meantime fixed in your special remore program using +locking. +"""]]