From bef29fbb2918eda14267d63789bc2843cf24c702 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://nullroute.eu.org/~grawity/" Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:05:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...mment_1_07195b4ec399ba1be6c8bdb3ae0fa50b._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/devblog/day_9__Friday_the_13th/comment_1_07195b4ec399ba1be6c8bdb3ae0fa50b._comment diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_9__Friday_the_13th/comment_1_07195b4ec399ba1be6c8bdb3ae0fa50b._comment b/doc/devblog/day_9__Friday_the_13th/comment_1_07195b4ec399ba1be6c8bdb3ae0fa50b._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..aff4dc264a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/devblog/day_9__Friday_the_13th/comment_1_07195b4ec399ba1be6c8bdb3ae0fa50b._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://nullroute.eu.org/~grawity/" + nickname="Mantas" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-09-13T22:05:37Z" + content=""" +Windows *does* have something very much like symlinks – they're called *symlinks* (\"symbolic links\") and they are meant to [\"function just like UNIX links\"][1] as the official docs say. + +But on the other hand, yes – `isSymlink` makes less sense on Windows, because symlinks are just a type of reparse points, and there may be several other types (e.g. directory junctions should also be treated like symlinks, but mount points shouldn't...) + +[1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365680(v=vs.85).aspx +"""]]