Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

doc/forum/Can_we_have_remotes_that_aren__39__t_tracked__63___.mdwn

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+I'm wondering if it is possible to have remotes that don't have the *content* of git-annex tracked.
+
+# My use case:
+
+I have a number of projects that I am working on at any one time.  They all are tracking independently by `git` and more recently I am using `git annex` to manage the large files.
+
+However because I have so many projects I work on one (called `AAA`), move to another, delete `AAA` to save disk space, ...time passes... return to `AAA`.
+
+Now, prior to `git-annex` I could just clone `AAA` from my central repository folder do work, commit, push, repeat and then delete and there is no indication that I had one, or many copies of `AAA` floating around.  Now with `git-annex` there is some trail of me cloning, running `git annex get`, etc.
+
+Is there some way to set a remote as `untracked`?  By that I mean it is classed as `untrusted` - so I can move files around, add them, copy to trusted remotes and delete the whole repository without worrying about losing data - but it also doesn't push any of the git-annex tracking info of where a copy of a file actually is.  I don't want to know if any or all of my other `untracked` repositories have a copy of a file or not. 
+
+I don't want my `git annex whereis` polluted with many references to repositories that just don't exist any more.  I guess I could set them to dead but that still keeps all of the tracking info around in all the repos, which seems unnecessary...

doc/forum/__34__git_annex_copy_--to___60__REMOTE__62___.__34___doesn__39__t_send_it_to_working_directory./comment_1_0c0a5999a92bf5880f2113177dc67cc2._comment

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://www.rfc1149.net/"
+ nickname="Sam"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2013-08-05T09:49:56Z"
+ content="""
+`git annex copy` will only push objects (content) into git annex private directory. You have to issue a `git annex merge` (or `git annex sync`) on the receiving end, or run `git annex assistant` there to update the working directory.
+
+Note that you can run `git annex merge` as a post-update hook if you want this to be done automatically.
+
+"""]]

doc/forum/__34__git_annex_copy_--to___60__REMOTE__62___.__34___doesn__39__t_send_it_to_working_directory./comment_2_c18083d9054f66f0bd51d63452af07eb._comment

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmqaNwDQ367zpW6cIRviLz6zJZZFODgoEI"
+ nickname="Zack"
+ subject="It worked!"
+ date="2013-08-05T09:57:25Z"
+ content="""
+Thanks for the help, it worked.
+"""]]

doc/tips/downloading_podcasts/comment_9_6a26a6cc7683d38fae0f23c5a52d1e23._comment

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://a-or-b.myopenid.com/"
+ ip="220.244.41.108"
+ subject="How do I switch on the 'feeds' feature?"
+ date="2013-08-05T04:52:41Z"
+ content="""
+Joey - your initial post said:
+
+    git-annex must be built with the Feeds feature (run git annex version to check).
+
+...but how do I actually switch on the feeds feature?
+
+I install git-annex from cabal, so I do
+
+    cabal update
+    cabal install git-annex
+
+which I did this morning and now `git annex version` gives me:
+
+    git-annex version: 4.20130802
+    build flags: Assistant Webapp Pairing Testsuite S3 WebDAV FsEvents XMPP DNS
+
+So it is the latest version, but without Feeds.  :-(
+"""]]

doc/todo/windows_support/comment_10_394127e34e07ab3dc0e7b94ee6898866._comment

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="4.152.108.145"
+ subject="comment 10"
+ date="2013-08-04T18:23:00Z"
+ content="""
+Encryption is now working on Windows.
+"""]]