From bec83689113a4ef53b1dfe952c2b11be704f96fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "aranea@650e41fad422f2a4d6f36ca1f20d41b7c0f18ab7" Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:29:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...ment_2_fe916fca47ca8506bce7ee6766d6c590._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_2_fe916fca47ca8506bce7ee6766d6c590._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_2_fe916fca47ca8506bce7ee6766d6c590._comment b/doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_2_fe916fca47ca8506bce7ee6766d6c590._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0cc329437f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_2_fe916fca47ca8506bce7ee6766d6c590._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="aranea@650e41fad422f2a4d6f36ca1f20d41b7c0f18ab7" + nickname="aranea" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/8574023ce00757ca95b1708b7306602a" + subject="comment 2" + date="2016-10-31T21:29:42Z" + content=""" +> What kind of performance benefit are we talking about here? + +Not much. In my benchmark, SKEIN512 was about 10% faster thank SKEIN256, and SKEIN256 has quite reasonable speed anyway. Thus, adding SKEIN512_256 is not neccessary if it complicated the code too much. + +Thanks anyway! +"""]]