Added a comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d3364265e
commit
b65d7f3d04
1 changed files with 19 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="Chel"
|
||||||
|
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/a42feb5169f70b3edf7f7611f7e3640c"
|
||||||
|
subject="comment 6"
|
||||||
|
date="2020-02-01T02:32:01Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
There is also `aaa/bbb/*.log.cid` in git-annex branch for \"per-remote content identifiers for keys\".
|
||||||
|
It could be another place to store alternate keys, but it is per-remote, so... no.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As for the metadata field `alt_keys` — it is another case of
|
||||||
|
\"[setting a metadata field to a key](/todo/Bidirectional_metadata/#comment-788380998b25267c5b99c4a865277102)\"
|
||||||
|
in [[Bidirectional metadata]].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Also, there is an interesting idea of [[git-annex-migrate using git-replace]].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
By the way, as far as I know (maybe things have changed since then),
|
||||||
|
ipfs has a similar problem of different identifiers for the same content.
|
||||||
|
Because it encodes how things are stored. And hash functions can also be changed.
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue