From 5e25fdbc046ca1baaadf0985b97a7b2165556126 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:12:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Added a comment --- ...comment_4_054f06311e2b51d73be569f181eb004f._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/design/assistant/android/comment_4_054f06311e2b51d73be569f181eb004f._comment diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/android/comment_4_054f06311e2b51d73be569f181eb004f._comment b/doc/design/assistant/android/comment_4_054f06311e2b51d73be569f181eb004f._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..76c32908a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/assistant/android/comment_4_054f06311e2b51d73be569f181eb004f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="4.153.8.30" + subject="comment 4" + date="2012-09-11T02:12:45Z" + content=""" +Thanks Bernard, that's really massively useful. It makes sense -- statically building with libc should work, the Android kernel is still Linux after all. + +To get past the iconv problem, I think all you need is part of the `locales` package from your linux system installed on the Android. Probably just a few of the data files from /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/ +"""]] From 9700428ce9e73d5c3a502dd8fc59d28d922b8c2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://mike.magin.org/" Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:51:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] --- doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn diff --git a/doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0a07db88dc --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +I'm curious how other people are using git-annex: + + * A single annex containing everything they want to keep track of (albeit with some files only available in some remotes). + * Several annexes for different purposes. + +I'm mostly asking because I don't want to get too far into using git-annex without thinking clearly about which is the most suitable choice for me. At present I have things split into two annexes, one for things I really wouldn't want to lose (and some of which are somewhat private), and another for comparatively throwaway items. However, given the possibility of setting different annex.numcopies on different file globs or directories, it seems like it might be kind of silly to make my life more complicated by having more than one annex. + +Primarily, I'm curious if there are some implications of the decision that I haven't considered. It seems like an obvious point that one would want different annexes is if they're used in distinctly different security-level environments (e.g. I'm happy to copy my FLAC (music) files over to my work computer which lives at the office, but I wouldn't want to copy personal financial documents there.) + +-Mike From bddf472ae4ae02663c528d1efc1945ea8b8fc296 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://mike.magin.org/" Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:54:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] --- doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn index 0a07db88dc..cafe2aa9f8 100644 --- a/doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn +++ b/doc/forum/one_annex_versus_many_annexes__63__.mdwn @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ I'm curious how other people are using git-annex: I'm mostly asking because I don't want to get too far into using git-annex without thinking clearly about which is the most suitable choice for me. At present I have things split into two annexes, one for things I really wouldn't want to lose (and some of which are somewhat private), and another for comparatively throwaway items. However, given the possibility of setting different annex.numcopies on different file globs or directories, it seems like it might be kind of silly to make my life more complicated by having more than one annex. -Primarily, I'm curious if there are some implications of the decision that I haven't considered. It seems like an obvious point that one would want different annexes is if they're used in distinctly different security-level environments (e.g. I'm happy to copy my FLAC (music) files over to my work computer which lives at the office, but I wouldn't want to copy personal financial documents there.) +Primarily, I'm curious if there are some implications of the decision that I haven't considered. It seems like an obvious point that one would want different annexes is if they're used in distinctly different security-level environments (e.g. I'm happy to copy my FLAC (music) files over to my work computer which lives at the office, but I wouldn't want to copy personal financial documents - or even the filenames - there.) -Mike