From 5ff3ca8b75aec0c485852b616637de2620c26eab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 22:58:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 01/28] Added a comment: debian squeeze --- ...mment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..563be1c6c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/install/Debian/comment_16_89f67da4a4a6a626a7db9c6674b244b6._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" + nickname="Dominik" + subject="debian squeeze" + date="2014-05-16T22:58:52Z" + content=""" +I'm tring to set up a bare repo on a debian squeeze server and sync it to windows client. Unfortunately the direct mode does not seem to be available for the git-annex version (3.20120629~bpo60+2 +) in the squeeze-backports + +Would you be able to update the version in that repository? Thank you for your hard work! Git-annex is awesome +"""]] From 89f37354e6e3633ff56c26722caf5c9ececcf0ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 23:05:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 02/28] Added a comment: multiple git-annex assistant processes --- .../comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/windows_support/comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9d7fb9ff00 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_14_79fc0ff98c5bba2ed616e52e5a58e28f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" + nickname="Dominik" + subject="multiple git-annex assistant processes" + date="2014-05-16T23:05:28Z" + content=""" +shouldn't be a problem though if all processes are spawned from the same service though, right? Or what problems did you have in mind? +"""]] From 2756f8ea9a9dd8265d2ea946dcbc7c16e81a2671 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 23:06:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 03/28] Added a comment: multiple git-annex assistant processes --- .../comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8f484dfb72 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" + nickname="Dominik" + subject="multiple git-annex assistant processes" + date="2014-05-16T23:06:38Z" + content=""" +shouldn't be a problem though if all processes are spawned from the same service though, right? Or what problems did you have in mind? +"""]] From 2db928d84984e6adcb82f1f86e535aa3a2dee70c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmNu4V5fvpLlBhaCUfXXOB0MI5NXwh8SkU" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 00:23:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 04/28] Added a comment --- ...mment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment b/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..69da79a89c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_3_3bec1f02ff1a61791e3cbb428c7acb4c._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmNu4V5fvpLlBhaCUfXXOB0MI5NXwh8SkU" + nickname="Adam" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T00:23:02Z" + content=""" +Well, like Pere, I am rather surprised by your response, Joey. I've been an enthusiastic supporter and follower of git-annex for a long time now, and have been looking forward to using it. I didn't expect a snarky reply...and you said yourself that it was snarky. Maybe you had a bad day or something? :) + +I don't understand why this request or idea is so controversial to you. I have several computers, and I use git to store basic text files like shell scripts and config files--a very common situation. I use Dropbox to sync them automatically between computers. I could use just git, and push/pull manually, but the whole point of having computers is for them to do things for me, automatically. The purpose of the git-annex assistant, as I understand it, is to do exactly that. Doing the push/pull manually would be a step backwards. And giving up manual control of the git repository, losing the ability to track changes to my files, would be a huge step backwards. + +This seems like it must be a very common use case among Linux users, especially ones who use the shell, git, etc. If git-annex isn't good for this situation, what is? Surely there's a better way than opening a shell and running \"git pull\" every time I walk from one computer to the other. +"""]] From 0aed6d9fc88ff6d8caa8ee8c39c6352db48111ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmNu4V5fvpLlBhaCUfXXOB0MI5NXwh8SkU" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 00:41:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 05/28] Added a comment --- ...ent_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment b/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9d0b024c1e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Storing_git_repos_in_git-annex/comment_4_76ddbd27cc2f3785bb5aaebb0bb6e087._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmNu4V5fvpLlBhaCUfXXOB0MI5NXwh8SkU" + nickname="Adam" + subject="comment 4" + date="2014-05-17T00:41:04Z" + content=""" +I should have also mentioned, the network topology is an issue that git-annex helps solve. When my computers are on the same LAN, they could obviously sync directly with each other using git. But when they are not on the same network, or when one of them is not online, a transfer repo is needed. Dropbox and git-annex make this simple by handling it for me. + +But if I did all my syncing with git manually, it could end up being quite a mess. If I took my laptop with me and left the house without syncing it first, I'd have to sync with my server on the Internet. But if I forgot to push from my desktop computer before I left, the server would be out-of-date, and I'd be stuck. + +Dropbox handles this for me by automatically syncing as soon as I make changes. git-annex does the same thing, but doesn't work with nested git repos. But giving up the nested git repo would mean giving up version control of my files. As a developer, you understand why that's not an option! :) + +Again, this seems like a very natural problem to run into, and I don't understand why it is controversial to want git-annex to handle this the way Dropbox or other sync software (e.g. SpiderOak, Wuala) can. +"""]] From dcac1f2db82b6bb952c5745aa0ada9a506419b98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnov5q9_Cl4Ps5NoYE08yE01NLSvBANnY8" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 09:21:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 06/28] --- ...x_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn diff --git a/doc/forum/Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn b/doc/forum/Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..20e435fcff --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Git_Annex_Assistant_won__39__t_backup_files_to_removable_drive.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +I'm using Git Annex Assistant for the first time, trying to get it to mirror a directory of files from my computer to an external USB drive. I've tried setting up the second repo as a "Removable Drive" in the "full backup" repository group. I've also tried putting it in the "client" group. The result is the same, and Assistant doesn't backup any of my files to the external drive. + +What I get in the external drive in the directory that should contain the repo are the set of files "annex, objects, refs, config, HEAD" and they are NOT in a .git subdirectory. Aside from this I don't see any of the files Git Annex Assistant says it has synced. As this is my first time using the Assistant, I don't know if this is a bug, or if I'm just using it incorrectly. If anyone knows what is going on here, please share. From d9d718c053752eb7e70fe5e11fe0627772845027 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkAUMhKOSkh9JaBA6xst3XxQIIsDEq5Zd4" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 10:56:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 07/28] Added a comment --- ..._907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/folder_size_question/comment_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/folder_size_question/comment_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment b/doc/forum/folder_size_question/comment_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a32e9177a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/folder_size_question/comment_4_907f3b1cfe745abf94a6a8ba0dbd4396._comment @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkAUMhKOSkh9JaBA6xst3XxQIIsDEq5Zd4" + nickname="Ovidiu" + subject="comment 4" + date="2014-05-17T10:56:22Z" + content=""" +I thinks its all the small files. + + du -hs /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/ + 77M /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/ + + du -hs /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/Finance/ + 38M /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/Finance/ + + du -hs /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/.git/ + 39M /Users/ovi/Sharing/git-annex/.git/ + +The GUI shows: + 46 136 859 bytes (80,6 MB on disk) for 8 002 items + +And the hidden .git folder shows: + 7 373 616 bytes (41 MB on disk) for 7 625 items + +So apparently there are a lot of very small files, smaller than the blocksize hence the info is skewed? Anyway, I think its alright? +"""]] From 0220ab8a6aaea83f99493e2c3651fe9620bb4af1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 12:22:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 08/28] Added a comment: Still not working --- ...2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8e27535307 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_2_adfa582d611ca501e21110282df07315._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="hyperio" + ip="62.31.92.216" + subject="Still not working" + date="2014-05-17T12:22:17Z" + content=""" +Thank you for your reply. I copied over the public key from computer 2 to computer 1 and tried to add it using git annex enableremote box.com keyid+=[keyid]. I am then asked for the passphrase for my private key on computer 1. Afterwards I am asked for the passphrase for the private key on computer 2... why? Obviously I don't have it so I get + +gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode +gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available + +git-annex: user error (gpg [\"--quiet\",\"--trust-model\",\"always\",\"--batch\",\"--decrypt\"] exited 2) + +Why would I need computer 2's secret key? Or I might just get it completely wrong. +Also, can the passphrase be remembered somewhere, so that I can use the assistant? (otherwise I think it won't work, because I would have to type the passphrase at every synchronisation attempt). + +Sorry for my confusion, thanks for your support. +"""]] From 4b28e990bda2862cac6ad7d2376e01b6f7c584a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 13:39:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 09/28] removed --- .../comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment b/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 8f484dfb72..0000000000 --- a/doc/todo/windows_support/comment_15_7a49d9b367a9a2621a51c30c4502cdac._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawm9ocq1Kb0WL-cz-LPpvd2Xm-q8tIQvqXA" - nickname="Dominik" - subject="multiple git-annex assistant processes" - date="2014-05-16T23:06:38Z" - content=""" -shouldn't be a problem though if all processes are spawned from the same service though, right? Or what problems did you have in mind? -"""]] From 00c9f77aafaf48e6879fd4f51eaed4ae85ade326 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:16:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 10/28] Added a comment --- ...2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..066fefa0ce --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_2_0ede40e0d68bfb9c6dbc1777f944ed06._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-05-17T14:16:12Z" + content=""" +One follow-up comment, because it occurred to me I might have phrased +the bug inadequately. By «revert» I didn’t mean a revert in the +git-sense, but merely «checking out» a file from a selected commit. + +But I think I can achieve this in direct mode on VFAT by doing «git +show upstream/branch~X:file > file», right? «git annex get file» then +gets the correct content, only that it will not place the content into +the indicated file until I do «git annex fsck». Maybe «git annex get» +could take this into account and have the content immediately stored +there. + +"""]] From fd6b6b4baef4864efffb9320ce5ef95c0573f671 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:18:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 11/28] Added a comment --- ...mment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment b/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..200210a021 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_2_45c22f596a18d5dc2331cfeef8c767fa._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-05-17T14:18:31Z" + content=""" +It occured to me that one could do something like that by «git show +earlier-commit:file > filename». A problem with this is that a +subsequent «get» will get the old content, but won’t put it in place +until invoking «fsck». + +"""]] From 0faf91b99e0b23e65971f96d2686378fed444916 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:21:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 12/28] Added a comment --- .../comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..6e5db42d0f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Revert_to_old_file_version_in_direct_mode___40__VFAT__41__/comment_3_4ce1601f5dbd8fb769d3c5bb429c3bc5._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T14:21:30Z" + content=""" +Plus it seems that the file can’t be dropped normally afterwards. +"""]] From 215d00a2670086d380a5c36029c3212e57fa25a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:24:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 13/28] Added a comment --- .../comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment b/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..265e0995a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/A_Way_To_Extract_Previous_Versions_of_a_File_From_a_Direct_Repo/comment_3_cbca264d86fe733b8106a4bf50c0c6ff._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="92.227.51.179" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T14:24:20Z" + content=""" +Plus it seems that the file can’t be dropped normally afterwards. +"""]] From 1917b0e3ef2dac38c3f4eacfcc24e6125aa82e4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:00:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 14/28] Added a comment --- ...t_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Distributing_data_to_a_set_of_drives/comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Distributing_data_to_a_set_of_drives/comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment b/doc/forum/Distributing_data_to_a_set_of_drives/comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5843ab1779 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Distributing_data_to_a_set_of_drives/comment_2_e13b4e5c1e6f1f503f93d521b504d5c1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="216.145.95.162" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-05-17T17:00:19Z" + content=""" +git-annex doesn't allow bonding repositories like that, but it does have repository groups which can accomplish the same thing. + +For example, if you put B C and D into the archive group, and set the [[preferred_content]] expression to \"standard\", then each repository will only want files that have not yet reached some other archive repository. + +Or, you can make up your own group name, like \"BCD\" and set the preferred content of each repository to something like \"not (copies=BCD:2)\" -- and now it will try to have 2 copies of each file on one of the drives. + +Once it's configured, using either the git-annex assistant, or `git annex sync --content` will copy files around according to the configuration. + +This will tend to fill up the first drive, or the first 2 drives, and only use subsequent drives if files don't fit on the first drive. You can use [[cost]] settings to control which drives files are put on. +"""]] From 57449307e1381d8874aa8828431e3e65773a49b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:02:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 15/28] Added a comment --- ...comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..692b307b10 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="216.145.95.162" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T17:02:15Z" + content=""" +I dont think it's possible for gpg to prompt for a passphrase when all it has is a public key, so I think you copied the private key too. + +gpg agents can cache your passphrase. +"""]] From 36baed603772338b1017399d3f9ea00038dcd5b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:03:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 16/28] Added a comment --- ...omment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..cd42becc27 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/install/Debian/comment_17_ef7f3e88d61833e51f0302e938343818._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="216.145.95.162" + subject="comment 17" + date="2014-05-17T17:03:31Z" + content=""" +Debian squeeze has an extremely ancient ghc compiler, and it would be a mammoth undertaking to build current git-annex using that. + +Use the linux standalone build instead. +"""]] From 78819c125de08452a745d205e7f714fbdd52eafc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:05:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 17/28] removed --- .../comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment deleted file mode 100644 index d58f294b64..0000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_9_97eaed998ffd1ed79585075ed5cff06e._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://hands.com/~phil/" - nickname="hands" - subject="any chance of a wheezy-backports upload?" - date="2013-05-30T18:43:52Z" - content=""" -I note that the instructions at the top of the page suggest that one can install the unstable version into wheezy, but as mentioned by [mey.vn](#comment-f9811cbd46471d4159d09d814ac9cf15) this is not the case with 4.20130521 (on amd64 at least) because of the libc6 version dependency. That being the case, it would be really nice to see this in wheezy-backports as well, or would that require backporting a huge pile of haskell as well? (in which case I can see why you're not keen). -"""]] From 8ee3c1c41bef05ae5e3a78ce8c6b4f687602ef28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:05:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 18/28] removed --- ...5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment deleted file mode 100644 index fae6c4df80..0000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_5_38e6399083e10a6a274f35bddc15d4ac._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawk3eiQwrpDGJ3MJb9NWB84m4tzQ6XjVZnY" - nickname="Allard" - subject="wheezy support" - date="2012-11-23T20:47:58Z" - content=""" -Hey Joey, - -As a backer, I'd like to see a backport of git annex assistant to wheezy. - -It is currently impossible to get this assistant in wheezy without compiling it with cabal. - -It would be nice to see it in backports or something :) - -Best, - -Allard -"""]] From 86d63096b0297f9c31d45ded8bd83be527459df3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:13:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 19/28] removed --- .../comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment deleted file mode 100644 index c4ce6b32ae..0000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_6_2e7bbdbaabbfb9d89de22e913066e822._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://svend.ciffer.net/" - ip="2001:4978:f:52e::2" - subject="comment 6" - date="2012-11-23T21:38:29Z" - content=""" -The git-annex packages in unstable install on testing (wheezy). -"""]] From 94eec11df7c529fd8c7b75614733329ff156f9d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:13:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 20/28] removed --- ...ment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment deleted file mode 100644 index a03038dc8a..0000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_10_d5da996e106d2e4d8a822aa9bcc78596._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://joeyh.name/" - nickname="joey" - subject="comment 10" - date="2013-05-30T19:42:05Z" - content=""" -As of today, I have backported everything except for haskell-lens, haskell-dav, and haskell-network-protocol-xmpp. The last is the only real blocker (I can build a backport without webdav support..). - -The haskell-network-protocol-xmpp in stable is actually ok, except it needs to be rebuilt against the haskell-gnutls I uploaded today. This fixes a bad segfault bug. I don't know how to handle this situation in backports TBH, and so am stuck waiting for a newer version of haskell-network-protocol-xmpp to reach testing, to get around backport's requirements that the backport version be in testing. - -In other words, it'll happen in 2 to 5 weeks, probably.. -"""]] From 9497dab651796ff89088cd2479dd962633c97d9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:14:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 21/28] removed --- .../comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 4507f36db1..0000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_11_84283676da247c401bc9b4bb12c2b453._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://hands.com/~phil/" - nickname="hands" - subject="comment 11" - date="2013-05-30T19:56:07Z" - content=""" -Fair enough -- that's more positive than I was expecting TBH -- Thanks Joey :-) -"""]] From d2304dfd8f5f1986449811dd2cc52672ae00d409 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:14:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 22/28] removed --- ...ent_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 419520c802..0000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_12_0aca83b055d0a9dd8589c50250a8bbea._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmF3Klaj8Q0Czfh1F3jaLF6issqeAhmru4" - nickname="Keith" - subject="Wheezy Support" - date="2013-07-05T21:21:39Z" - content=""" -Joey, - -What's the status on the wheezy backport. I'm itching to try the assistant. - -thanks, -Keith -"""]] From 500edc1f230ba08dffae396e958e5845370a07e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:15:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 23/28] removed --- .../comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/install/Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment diff --git a/doc/install/Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment b/doc/install/Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 9f05fea931..0000000000 --- a/doc/install/Debian/comment_13_167a091764e5e99ec0f35a65e95a22de._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="http://joeyh.name/" - ip="4.153.254.222" - subject="comment 13" - date="2013-07-07T17:21:10Z" - content=""" -I remain stuck where I was stuck previously on the backport. In the meantime, use [[Linux_standalone]] :( -"""]] From 588793703b5f6353c1246ae2cca0f6d8e91f93ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:25:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 24/28] Added a comment: Still not working --- .../comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..6bd457506c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="hyperio" + ip="62.31.92.216" + subject="Still not working" + date="2014-05-17T17:25:04Z" + content=""" +I experted the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... +"""]] From 3e0bff2da931f0df56cef1332ef27164bc10a8bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:25:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 25/28] Added a comment: Still not working --- .../comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a9c2bb9b54 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="hyperio" + ip="62.31.92.216" + subject="Still not working" + date="2014-05-17T17:25:23Z" + content=""" +I exported the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... +"""]] From 5cc892e3cd686cacfac3c0a2df86d075c2f5d885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:25:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 26/28] Added a comment: Still not working --- .../comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..93fa8b5b9c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_6_097f52aaf178340b3abb5bfc80f0d447._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="hyperio" + ip="62.31.92.216" + subject="Still not working" + date="2014-05-17T17:25:39Z" + content=""" +I exported the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... +"""]] From 94f0576e22436ea44fb89c3214d7c5a30b5f3798 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:26:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 27/28] removed --- .../comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 6bd457506c..0000000000 --- a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_4_fb46e6f3bf3578cff0d592baa94c7183._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="hyperio" - ip="62.31.92.216" - subject="Still not working" - date="2014-05-17T17:25:04Z" - content=""" -I experted the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... -"""]] From 64c47d8ca23e543bdacaf7f9393c617443dfc8bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hyperio Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:27:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 28/28] removed --- .../comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment deleted file mode 100644 index a9c2bb9b54..0000000000 --- a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_5_62c65fd298378eea2930de83c98783ea._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="hyperio" - ip="62.31.92.216" - subject="Still not working" - date="2014-05-17T17:25:23Z" - content=""" -I exported the public key on computer 2 with gpg --armor --export [keyid] and just imported it on computer 1... -"""]]