From b1621cdda6e875b55154de8d33f4317dfaf3ed56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:01:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] comment

---
 ...omment_20_59066dc14b5b45a3a15ee65cf6746bab._comment | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/standalone_tarballs_for_specific_versions/comment_20_59066dc14b5b45a3a15ee65cf6746bab._comment

diff --git a/doc/forum/standalone_tarballs_for_specific_versions/comment_20_59066dc14b5b45a3a15ee65cf6746bab._comment b/doc/forum/standalone_tarballs_for_specific_versions/comment_20_59066dc14b5b45a3a15ee65cf6746bab._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..37d5a2c8d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/standalone_tarballs_for_specific_versions/comment_20_59066dc14b5b45a3a15ee65cf6746bab._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 20"""
+ date="2021-03-12T16:00:20Z"
+ content="""
+That's strange, the repo's git-annex branch was somehow behind, but its
+info/refs had the branch up-to-date with the information. I don't know how
+that can happen as git update-server-info updates the latter based on the
+former, but git-annex sync in the repo does look to have fixed the problem.
+"""]]