From b049a6dedb06262997345c42ce0ee29c11fdf939 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "t.z.mates" Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:44:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: Thanks! --- ...ment_13_61f13e76890340bd5ae97dab6d6c0141._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/add_fails_with_v6_repo_when_four_levels_deep/comment_13_61f13e76890340bd5ae97dab6d6c0141._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/add_fails_with_v6_repo_when_four_levels_deep/comment_13_61f13e76890340bd5ae97dab6d6c0141._comment b/doc/bugs/add_fails_with_v6_repo_when_four_levels_deep/comment_13_61f13e76890340bd5ae97dab6d6c0141._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ada3fd8e18 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/add_fails_with_v6_repo_when_four_levels_deep/comment_13_61f13e76890340bd5ae97dab6d6c0141._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="t.z.mates" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/90f15fad216078fd08d62cc676487925" + subject="Thanks!" + date="2018-07-19T19:44:25Z" + content=""" +Wow, I'm really appreciate the in-depth analysis. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with the inner workings of git/git-annex to dig that deep, so I'm happy you were able to (intermittently) reproduce it. In particular, it seems you've done some great work with the smudge filters, but that's all way above my head still. + +That's good to know that it was actually a bug in git itself. Thanks for submitting the bug report; hopefully that takes care of the problem. + +Using `GIT_PREFIX` is a clever work-around. I appreciate all your help with this! +"""]]