Added a comment: readonly special remotes]
This commit is contained in:
parent
89abda9efd
commit
afb1be754a
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="Ilya_Shlyakhter"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/1647044369aa7747829c38b9dcc84df0"
|
||||
subject="readonly special remotes]"
|
||||
date="2019-05-28T17:25:19Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
\"Setting readonly=true for a special remote prevents using the external special remote program at all\" -- that's the part I didn't realize. If I understand correctly:
|
||||
|
||||
1. for all remotes, setting `readonly=true` \"prevents git-annex from making changes to a remote... this both prevents git-annex sync from pushing changes, and prevents storing or removing files from read-only remote.\"
|
||||
2. additionally, for special remotes, this \"prevents using the external special remote program at all\", and instead causes `git-annex` to be [downloading the content of a file using a regular http connection, with no authentication](https://git-annex.branchable.com/design/external_special_remote_protocol/#index9h2)?
|
||||
|
||||
If so, it would be best to add a separate config setting for (2). I'm not sure, though, why that case needs special handling. If a key's contents is available at a regular `http` URL, shouldn't the key be recorded as present in the built-in web special remote, rather than the user-defined special remote?
|
||||
|
||||
The external special remote here is one I wrote myself, for accessing data on [DNAnexus](https://www.dnanexus.com/).
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue