mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

move conversation to a real bug report

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2011-05-15 20:33:39 -04:00
parent 6aab88fa25
commit af54d40d5b
10 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog.mdwn Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
Conversation moved from [[walkthrough/recover_data_from_lost+found]]
to a proper bug. --[[Joey]]

18
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_1_6a41bf7e2db83db3a01722b516fb6886._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 1"
date="2011-05-12T00:07:29Z"
content="""
I followed this to re-inject files which git annex fsck listed as missing.
For everyone of those files, I get
git-annex-shell: key is already present in annex
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(601) [sender=3.0.8]
when trying to copy the files to the remote.
-- Richard
"""]]

8
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_2_9f5f1dbffb2dd24f4fcf8c2027bf0384._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 2"
date="2011-05-12T01:01:34Z"
content="""
Sounds like you probably didn't commit after the fsck, or didn't push so the other repository did not know the first had the content again -- but I'm not 100% sure.
"""]]

14
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_3_b596b5cfd3377e58dbbb5d509d026b90._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 3"
date="2011-05-14T09:06:54Z"
content="""
As my comment from work is stuck in moderation:
I ran this twice:
git pull && git annex add . && git annex copy . --to <remote> --fast --quiet && git commit -a -m \"$HOST $(date +%F--%H-%M-%S-%Z)\" && git push
but nothing changed
"""]]

12
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_4_d7112c315fb016a8a399e24e9b6461d8._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 4"
date="2011-05-14T16:13:58Z"
content="""
Hmm. Old versions may have forgotten to git add a .git-annex location log file when recovering content with fsck. That could be another reason things are out of sync.
But I'm not clear on which repo is trying to copy files to which.
(NB: If the files were recovered on a bare git repo, fsck cannot update the location log there, which could also explain this.)
"""]]

14
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_5_4ea29a6f8152eddf806c536de33ef162._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 5"
date="2011-05-14T19:03:43Z"
content="""
Version: 0.20110503
My local non-bare repo is copying to a remote bare repo.
I have been recovering in a non-bare repo.
If there is anything I can send you to help... If I removed said files and went through http://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/No_easy_way_to_re-inject_a_file_into_an_annex/ -- would that help?
"""]]

8
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_6_0d85f114a103bd6532a3b3b24466012e._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 6"
date="2011-05-14T19:23:45Z"
content="""
Well, focus on a specific file that exhibits the problem. What does `git annex whereis` say about it? Is the content actually present in annex/objects/ on the bare repository? Does that contradict whereis?
"""]]

12
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_7_d38d5bee6d360b0ea852f39e3a7b1bc6._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 7"
date="2011-05-14T23:13:15Z"
content="""
It exists locally, whereis tells me it exists locally and locally, only.
The object is _not_ in the bare repo.
The file _might_ have gone missing before I upgraded my annex backend version to 2. Could this be a factor?
"""]]

10
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_8_29c3de4bf5fbd990b230c443c0303cbe._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 8"
date="2011-05-15T00:09:34Z"
content="""
What you're describing should be impossible; the error message shown can only occur if the object is present in the annex where `git-annex-shell recvkey` is run. So something strange is going on.
Try reproducing it by running on the remote system, `git-annex-shell recvkey /remote/repo.git $key` .. if you can reproduce it, I guess the next thing to do will be to strace the command and see why it's thinking the object is there.
"""]]

8
doc/bugs/copy_fast_confusing_with_broken_locationlog/comment_9_2cee4f6bd6db7518fd61453c595162c6._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 9"
date="2011-05-15T09:16:49Z"
content="""
Just to make sure: How do I get $key? What I did was look at the path in the object store of the local repo and see if that exact same path & file existed in the remote.
"""]]