mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

comment, delink, close as dup

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2025-04-15 09:48:16 -04:00
parent 33e21b1414
commit af42271d37
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: DB12DB0FF05F8F38
2 changed files with 50 additions and 3 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

27
doc/todo/Abstract__44__LibreVault__44__ResilioSync_alternative_on_NDN.mdwn
View file

@ -1,5 +1,26 @@
Average users could get so much value out of a simple and intuitive p2p file-syncing service that is as polished as [ResilioSync](https://www.resilio.com/sync/), provides revision control on arbitrary files like [Abstract (version control for designers)](https://www.goabstract.com/), but open source like LibreVault, SyncThing and SparkleShare. This would be priceless for science, design, all sorts of collaborative workspaces, and especially for backups and data redundancy.
Average users could get so much value out of a simple and intuitive p2p
file-syncing service that is as polished as ResilioSync
(https://www.resilio.com/sync/), provides revision control on arbitrary
files like Abstract (version control for designers)
(https://www.goabstract.com/), but open source like LibreVault, SyncThing
and SparkleShare. This would be priceless for science, design, all sorts of
collaborative workspaces, and especially for backups and data redundancy.
Currently, `git-annex` depends on Tor and [Magic Wormhole](https://github.com/magic-wormhole/magic-wormhole) to share/collaborate/sync with others. There is [Hypercore](https://docs.pears.com/building-blocks/hypercore) by [Holepunch](https://holepunch.to/), but [Named Data Networking (NDN)](https://named-data.net/project/archoverview/) ([video](https://youtu.be/qbAB0iN1-zQ)) offers a more robust internet backbone.
Currently, `git-annex` depends on Tor and [Magic
Wormhole](https://github.com/magic-wormhole/magic-wormhole) to
share/collaborate/sync with others. There is
[Hypercore](https://docs.pears.com/building-blocks/hypercore) by
[Holepunch](https://holepunch.to/), but [Named Data Networking
(NDN)](https://named-data.net/project/archoverview/)
([video](https://youtu.be/qbAB0iN1-zQ)) offers a more robust internet
backbone.
Even better, there was an experiment for "[Distributed Git over Named Data Networking](https://github.com/JonnyKong/GitSync)" and [npChat](https://github.com/named-data-mobile/ndn-photo-app/issues/186) both exist. Could NDN be used as the backbone for a built-in method for connections to be made for `git-annex` and set the foundation—pave the way—for the perfect file synchronization/sharing app?
Even better, there was an experiment for "[Distributed Git over Named Data
Networking](https://github.com/JonnyKong/GitSync)" and
[npChat](https://github.com/named-data-mobile/ndn-photo-app/issues/186)
both exist. Could NDN be used as the backbone for a built-in method for
connections to be made for `git-annex` and set the foundation—pave the
way—for the perfect file synchronization/sharing app?
> treating this as a duplicate of [[todo/generic_p2p_socket_transport]];
> [[done]] --[[Joey]]

26
doc/todo/Abstract__44__LibreVault__44__ResilioSync_alternative_on_NDN/comment_1_f511d430a948a9048eb8e8cede047bd4._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="joey"
subject="""comment 1"""
date="2025-04-15T13:31:34Z"
content="""
Honestly, your message somewhat triggered my internal spam filters. In
particular, its linking to multiple proprietary services adjacent to
glowing language about them. Also the very
similar language and linking in your post at
<https://github.com/named-data-mobile/ndn-photo-app/issues/186>.
For this reason, I have removed some hyperlinks from your post.
While I think, on review, that you are acting in good faith,
I also think it's important you understand a post like this can
cause that kind of reaction these days. And removing the links
will thus help no matter what.
---
There is actually an open todo at [[todo/generic_p2p_socket_transport]]
which I think could probably be used to implement what you are envisioning.
So my suggestion is you review that proposed design and see if it would
support the use cases you are envisioning. And if not, what changes would
need to be made.
"""]]