From ae61ee34c0d133c277024d9698e530205cde231b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya_Shlyakhter Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:10:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: atomic/transactional upgrades --- .../comment_1_ef44b98740b33d6a7cab0cc5caf4be15._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/upgrade_to_V8_fails/comment_1_ef44b98740b33d6a7cab0cc5caf4be15._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/upgrade_to_V8_fails/comment_1_ef44b98740b33d6a7cab0cc5caf4be15._comment b/doc/bugs/upgrade_to_V8_fails/comment_1_ef44b98740b33d6a7cab0cc5caf4be15._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..895a649d77 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/upgrade_to_V8_fails/comment_1_ef44b98740b33d6a7cab0cc5caf4be15._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Ilya_Shlyakhter" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/1647044369aa7747829c38b9dcc84df0" + subject="atomic/transactional upgrades" + date="2020-03-05T19:10:16Z" + content=""" +Related question: is [[git-annex-upgrade]] atomic, in the sense of restoring old state if an upgrade fails? +"""]]