From adaeba010f1a2b405d3045fbe240a1a412be0d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:03:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...nt_1_7cebbecfc10c22fa58c5c1c97b9c6369._comment | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_1_7cebbecfc10c22fa58c5c1c97b9c6369._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_1_7cebbecfc10c22fa58c5c1c97b9c6369._comment b/doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_1_7cebbecfc10c22fa58c5c1c97b9c6369._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8199cadcd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_1_7cebbecfc10c22fa58c5c1c97b9c6369._comment @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2016-10-31T16:54:30Z" + content=""" +What kind of performance benefit are we talking about here? + +It seems it would be a bit hard to implement this, since Backend.Hash uses +a HashSize that is just an Int, which would have to be extended with the +number of bits to use of a longer hash. Not hard hard but it will +complicate the code. + +(Also, the name "SKEIN512_256" is pretty long itself to include in a +filename.") +"""]]