From acc1dc37b04008a8f8a11ccbe06f4b2256ee8ce8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:04:14 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] followup --- ...mment_4_da51390e7b67cd1dc075c793e99d4367._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/add_ancient_armel_build/comment_4_da51390e7b67cd1dc075c793e99d4367._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/add_ancient_armel_build/comment_4_da51390e7b67cd1dc075c793e99d4367._comment b/doc/todo/add_ancient_armel_build/comment_4_da51390e7b67cd1dc075c793e99d4367._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7ef936ff96 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/add_ancient_armel_build/comment_4_da51390e7b67cd1dc075c793e99d4367._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 4""" + date="2018-10-03T16:58:26Z" + content=""" +Unfortunately the build failed in an obscure way while installing the deps +of git-annex back when I tried to set it up. + +I tried it again today, and there's no longer a binary of stack for armel, +only for armhf, so I don't think this build can be provided, at least not +without quite a lot of backporting. +"""]]