diff --git a/doc/bugs/Bloom_filter_capacity_too_large_to_represent/comment_4_9fb9fdbc6218d6b86b0921f411f78891._comment b/doc/bugs/Bloom_filter_capacity_too_large_to_represent/comment_4_9fb9fdbc6218d6b86b0921f411f78891._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..77097e07ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Bloom_filter_capacity_too_large_to_represent/comment_4_9fb9fdbc6218d6b86b0921f411f78891._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.132"
+ subject="turns out to be an upstream bug already filed"
+ date="2014-09-12T17:46:23Z"
+ content="""
+It seems that this is a bug on bloomfilter 2.0.0.0 on armel generally. It's also preventing this newer version from building on armel currently:
+
+<http://bugs.debian.org/756801>
+
+The git-annex standalone arm autobuilder installed it with cabal, so ended up with the newer, broken version. 
+"""]]