From a9bf5cfcf32fc6c25df79798ea27947eec3cf64d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:15:51 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...t_17_bebe0ee51ba6a6c23ee3e4e5999d575b._comment | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/35_failed_tests_on_beegfs/comment_17_bebe0ee51ba6a6c23ee3e4e5999d575b._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/35_failed_tests_on_beegfs/comment_17_bebe0ee51ba6a6c23ee3e4e5999d575b._comment b/doc/bugs/35_failed_tests_on_beegfs/comment_17_bebe0ee51ba6a6c23ee3e4e5999d575b._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..61164d930a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/35_failed_tests_on_beegfs/comment_17_bebe0ee51ba6a6c23ee3e4e5999d575b._comment @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 17""" + date="2025-09-15T16:07:35Z" + content=""" +Drat. Reopened bug. + +Is the error for these still "export.ex [...] Device or resource busy"? + +If so, the problem must not be beegfs not liking an open file to be +renamed, but something else. + +I have verified that the temp file that gets renamed to the "export.ex" +log file is now opened with `O_CLOEXEC`. +"""]]