mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: found related bug

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
cnjr2 2022-11-29 16:51:44 +00:00 • committed by admin
parent c29e2ed916
commit a92a07b03e
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/bugs/long_file_extensions___40__e.g._.numbers__41___dropped/comment_3_1f4bc975621d24e6e43d887693ada800._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="cnjr2"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f7e9654cc967c8815947b19829bfd746"
subject="found related bug"
date="2022-11-29T16:51:44Z"
content="""
I have searched around some more and found a related bug report. As per [your comment](https://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/Wrong_backend_extension_in_files_with_multiple_dots/#comment-1e0885e62a9c22baae6300d2312c5163) what constitutes a file extension is determined by heuristics. So I guess my question would become: Would it be a bad idea to have long (and ugly) file extensions (i.e. `.numbers`) be recognized as as extensions? What would be situations where that would go wrong?
"""]]