From a8cf062ca1607172ecc08f3c09cca07e9399da8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:11:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...mment_3_c6c8d3c84afa497bfdfe25b492dac5b9._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/incremental_fsck_should_not_use_sticky_bit/comment_3_c6c8d3c84afa497bfdfe25b492dac5b9._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck_should_not_use_sticky_bit/comment_3_c6c8d3c84afa497bfdfe25b492dac5b9._comment b/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck_should_not_use_sticky_bit/comment_3_c6c8d3c84afa497bfdfe25b492dac5b9._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..17d7a3aab8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck_should_not_use_sticky_bit/comment_3_c6c8d3c84afa497bfdfe25b492dac5b9._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="209.250.56.64" + subject="comment 3" + date="2013-12-02T19:11:27Z" + content=""" +HongoDB doesn't build with current hackage. + +keyvaluehash passed some inital load etc tests. The inability to delete old keys/values might not be a significant problem. + +However I don't think it has any ACID guarantees; eg a crash at the wrong time could leave the database in some inconsistent state. +"""]]