From a89ed8616d65c078c03558ae3814fdb8e2288d66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" <joey@web> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:16:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/assistant_does_not_warn_on_files_it_failed_to_add/comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/assistant_does_not_warn_on_files_it_failed_to_add/comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment b/doc/bugs/assistant_does_not_warn_on_files_it_failed_to_add/comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..10c068f137 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/assistant_does_not_warn_on_files_it_failed_to_add/comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 5" + date="2013-04-08T21:16:33Z" + content=""" +\"I would imagine\" is not a useful debugging method. I asked you to run `git annex add` so that if it succeeds, I have a verified data point that reduces the problem space to only code inside the assistant, and if it fails, I have an easy way to reproduce the problem to debug further. At the moment, I have neither. :P + +`.gitignore` is really, truely, not supported by the assistant. I just ran your test case, and it added `file.test` as soon as I created it. Also, I never wrote support for `.gitignore`; I know right where that support should go, and I have a dozen people who have complained it is not supported. +"""]]