From a89ed8616d65c078c03558ae3814fdb8e2288d66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://joeyh.name/" <joey@web>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:16:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment

---
 ...comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/bugs/assistant_does_not_warn_on_files_it_failed_to_add/comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment

diff --git a/doc/bugs/assistant_does_not_warn_on_files_it_failed_to_add/comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment b/doc/bugs/assistant_does_not_warn_on_files_it_failed_to_add/comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..10c068f137
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/assistant_does_not_warn_on_files_it_failed_to_add/comment_5_a2ff7668f2a0d549b362d7de97fac8a1._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 5"
+ date="2013-04-08T21:16:33Z"
+ content="""
+\"I would imagine\" is not a useful debugging method. I asked you to run `git annex add` so that if it succeeds, I have a verified data point that reduces the problem space to only code inside the assistant, and if it fails, I have an easy way to reproduce the problem to debug further. At the moment, I have neither. :P
+
+`.gitignore` is really, truely, not supported by the assistant. I just ran your test case, and it added `file.test` as soon as I created it. Also, I never wrote support for `.gitignore`; I know right where that support should go, and I have a dozen people who have complained it is not supported.
+"""]]