Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com
This commit is contained in:
commit
a88b671bd9
1 changed files with 20 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="yarikoptic"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4"
|
||||
subject="more ideas for async implementation"
|
||||
date="2020-07-02T17:44:44Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
Thank you Joey for considering implementing this! Some additional tune up might be desired for optimal \"performance\" if possible. Having globus in mind: it is better to \"stage\" all the transfers TODO and then commence the transfer. So may be it could be something like this where if \"BATCH\" is appended to TRANSFER-ASYNC response from remote, at the end of \"scheduling\" all transfers for now, `git annex` would trigger actual transfer with an empty `TRANSFER-ASYNC`?:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
> TRANSFER RETRIEVE Key1 file
|
||||
< TRANSFER-ASYNC Key1 BATCH
|
||||
> TRANSFER RETRIEVE Key2 file
|
||||
< TRANSFER-ASYNC Key2 BATCH
|
||||
> TRANSFER-ASYNC
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Also per file progress might not be available (yet to check more details) -- there is a total progress for a job (multiple files). So may be `BATCH` could be the BATCH-ID of a kind and TRANSFER-PROGRESS be reported not for a key but for the BATCH-ID (absent overlap with KEYS values could be guaranteed by special remote by using UUIDs or alike)?
|
||||
|
||||
Re retries and failures: may be if special remote would also return `TRANSFER-SUCCESS RETRIEVE BATCH-ID` at the end, annex could see if any KEY was not reported success on, and then retry only those?
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue