mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

cleanup

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2016-09-23 09:47:48 -04:00
parent d1dabb3327
commit a59148c3a7
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: C910D9222512E3C7
5 changed files with 0 additions and 53 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
doc/news/version_6.20160419/comment_1_b7d20a64e3ddb99a30920e8f614abe6c._comment
View file

@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="zfnupbos@a80a4f4cf5dde7ac4988ef0d077052c95fe1e058"
nickname="zfnupbos"
subject="version clarification"
date="2016-05-04T01:05:52Z"
content="""
is this 6.20160419 or 6.20160428?
It was released on the 28th, and 'git-annex version' shows git-annex version: 6.20160428-g1f253e8. But many places refer to it as 6.20160419.
"""]]

14
doc/news/version_6.20160419/comment_2_88dd2807bda89ca9c61826e68140f7af._comment
View file

@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="joey"
subject="""comment 2"""
date="2016-05-04T17:19:17Z"
content="""
I should have changed the version number to 6.20160428, but I forgot to do
so.
The version shows up in `git annex version` because it uses the build
date there, for autobuilds.
So in short, both versions are equivilant, and both contain the security
fix.
"""]]

9
doc/news/version_6.20160511/comment_1_c7ad57b324c94d0a3eb00b9d624f7b66._comment
View file

@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="CandyAngel"
subject="comment 1"
date="2016-05-16T11:41:08Z"
content="""
I've very happy to report that the git-add, git-annex-fsck & 'git-annex-reinject --known' workflow is working great!
Thank you for adding these :)
"""]]

9
doc/news/version_6.20160613/comment_1_89cfca1174ea3e50a536053e73027296._comment
View file

@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="CandyAngel"
subject="comment 1"
date="2016-06-21T08:46:50Z"
content="""
Improve SHA*E extension extraction code.
This sounds really likely to break things like [recovering files by readding](https://git-annex.branchable.com/tips/recover_data_from_lost+found/), because the key is going to be different, despite having the same backend..
"""]]

11
doc/news/version_6.20160613/comment_2_c30ce151490345ac5283e3900c26f173._comment
View file

@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="joey"
subject="""comment 2"""
date="2016-07-12T19:55:52Z"
content="""
In this case, the change only makes eg, "foo.ba__________r" not be considered
to have an extension of ".bar". So it's unlikely to affect many files.
I do try to keep the extension guessing code fairly stable to prevent breaking
re-adding. But sometimes a bug does warrant changing it.
"""]]