mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

correction

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2017-09-07 16:00:03 -04:00
parent a50d061570
commit a55b2045ad
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: DB12DB0FF05F8F38
1 changed files with 13 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

15
doc/devblog/day_468__export_renames/comment_2_7fbbc5beb80acf32eff617ec704d5466._comment
View file

@ -3,6 +3,17 @@
subject="""comment 2""" subject="""comment 2"""
date="2017-09-07T19:54:41Z" date="2017-09-07T19:54:41Z"
content=""" content="""
Yes, I considered such cases, also cycles with multiple files, etc. Did not consider such a case. However, that's closely related to exporting
All will work! :) files with same content being inefficient. There's a move
operation but no copy operation. I might add a copy operation eventually,
unsure.
If a copy operation is added, then that rename case can be handled more
efficiently, by moving to the single temp file and copying. Although it
might still involve the special remote doing more work than strictly
necessary depending on how it implements copy.
At some point you have to pick simplicity and ability to recover from
problems over totally optimal speed though, and I think your case is a
reasonable place to draw the line.
"""]] """]]