todo
This commit is contained in:
parent
57fa459f15
commit
a4bd508643
1 changed files with 28 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||||
|
If a remote is only available on some networks, a command like `git annex drop`
|
||||||
|
or `git annex get` may try to access the remote each time a file is
|
||||||
|
processed, and suffer a long timeout each time. It seems git-annex could
|
||||||
|
remember that a previous access of a remote failed, and automatically
|
||||||
|
de-prioritize that remote, eg adjust its cost to below the next remote on
|
||||||
|
the list. So it would learn about the current situation the process finds
|
||||||
|
itself in.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Seems this would be easy for checkPresent, since it throws an exception
|
||||||
|
if the remote cannot be accessed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Other methods like storeKey and retrieveKeyFile don't differentiate between
|
||||||
|
the remote not being accessible, and the action failing. It could be a lot
|
||||||
|
of work and complication to add that distinction, including needing to
|
||||||
|
change the external special remote protocol.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Implementing it for at least checkPresent would be a good start. That would
|
||||||
|
cover `git annex drop` and `git annex copy --to` and probably a few other
|
||||||
|
commands.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This learning could be unwanted behavior if git-annex is running while the
|
||||||
|
computer is migrating between networks. Then it might de-prioritize a
|
||||||
|
remote before it travels to the network where it can use that remote. This
|
||||||
|
would mostly affect the assistant since it's run for long periods of time.
|
||||||
|
It could undo the de-prioritization when it sees that the network has
|
||||||
|
changed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--[[Joey]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue