Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2013-02-11 16:01:12 -04:00
commit a474688a3d
5 changed files with 34 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://mlinden.myopenid.com/"
ip="2001:470:d1c3:0:5c01:5562:e242:37b9"
subject=""Build native GNU/Linux applications: the easy way""
date="2013-02-10T22:02:19Z"
content="""
Maybe this helps:
[[http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1444792]]
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnbBRfl5F8gKRr1ko8Ai6FbEZStXXNF1S4"
nickname="Áron"
subject="another android git app"
date="2013-02-11T08:20:42Z"
content="""
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.madgag.agit&hl=en
I used it and its decent and certainly runs git as a backend (although I havent seen its internals)
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Do both friends need to be online in order for Jabber syncing to work? Or will the pushed changes be stored on the Jabber server, so that when the remote machine does come online it can pull them even if the original machine is now offline?

View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
I would like it if the webapp could support setting up [bare remotes](http://git-annex.branchable.com/tips/centralized_git_repository_tutorial/) to assist with syncing between two machines that are never online at the same time.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
Hi there,
first of all, great job done on annex! I think I finally found what I was looking for to organize all my data.
My question: when I do git annex whereis Music, I get a detailed list of every single song and its remote locations. I have tens of thousands of songs, so just typing git annex whereis Music gives me way too much information.
Here is my proposition: in my case, every file of the Music folder resides in the same remote. So, wouldn't it be better to show just one line of output telling me that Music is on remote bla and blub, and then I know that all files in Music are in remotes bla and blub?
Is that possible now already or would that be a feature request? What do you think?
Cheers,
Moritz.
PS: I know that I can specify filters, e.g. git annex whereis --in bla --and --not --in blub. That is great!