From a42da2ed393b86c31e91e3e685538902449e25ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 
 "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmdbVIGiDH8KarAGAy8y2FHJD_F990JzXI"
 <Franois@web>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 09:27:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH]

---
 ...cal_remote_instead_of_broken_link_when_possible__63__.mdwn | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/Link_to_local_remote_instead_of_broken_link_when_possible__63__.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/forum/Link_to_local_remote_instead_of_broken_link_when_possible__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/Link_to_local_remote_instead_of_broken_link_when_possible__63__.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..dfe8afe2c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Link_to_local_remote_instead_of_broken_link_when_possible__63__.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+Hi,
+
+Suppose I have an annexed file whose content is stored on an extenal hard drive.
+When the hard drive is mounted, is it possible to have immediately access to this file without transfering it, by modifying the symlink to point to the file content on the hard drive instead of having a broken link?