Thoughs on a "recent remote activity" feature
This commit is contained in:
parent
0f2dda81e4
commit
a2749664ab
1 changed files with 29 additions and 0 deletions
29
doc/todo/Recent_remote_activities.mdwn
Normal file
29
doc/todo/Recent_remote_activities.mdwn
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
|||
It would be great to have a way to find out when a remote was last "active" and what happened. This can help with:
|
||||
|
||||
- knowing which remotes can safely be marked "dead", as it didn't "do" anything for the last 10 years
|
||||
- finding out what exactly a repository is or where it was, if the (auto-generated) description isn't helpful
|
||||
- double-checking if one's setup indeed does the expected, puts files where they should go, etc.
|
||||
- maybe for sorting the remotes in `git annex info` by a `last contact` time? (see also here, sorting by description would already be cool and better than sorting by UUID, which is random: https://git-annex.branchable.com/todo/Sorting_remotes_by_description_in___96__git_annex_info__96__/)
|
||||
|
||||
For a specific file, one can already get an activity log for a specific remote with `git annex log`:
|
||||
|
||||
[[!format bash """
|
||||
git annex log thatfile.pdf | grep 5091aa91-fb08-44b1-aece-7406257103f8
|
||||
# + Mon, 27 Mar 2023 21:39:07 CEST thatfile.pdf | 5091aa91-fb08-44b1-aece-7406257103f8 -- ThatRemoteName
|
||||
"""]]
|
||||
|
||||
But that is very slow and doesn't scale at all for considering all files.
|
||||
|
||||
There's also the `activity.log` in the git-annex branch, which AFAIK currently only logs `git annex fsck` invocation timestamps:
|
||||
|
||||
[[!format bash """
|
||||
git annex log thatfile.pdf | grep 091aa91-fb08-44b1-aece-7406257103f8
|
||||
# 091aa91-fb08-44b1-aece-7406257103f8 Fsck timestamp=1743873054s
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
"""]]
|
||||
|
||||
The commit messages on the git-annex branch don't include the remote's ID (which might be helpful but hogs disk space?), so that can't be used to inspect activity - one doesn't know who did the commit.
|
||||
|
||||
Any ideas how this could be done?
|
||||
|
||||
Cheers, Yann
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue