foo
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5606f1c43
commit
a17ece1428
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ number of copies that are in repositories that are not in the offline group.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
That might be expressed as say, `copies=!offline:1`
|
That might be expressed as say, `copies=!offline:1`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Then `not copies=!offline:1` would be useful to only want files that are
|
Then `not copies=!offline:0` would be useful to only want files that are
|
||||||
available in some repository that is not offline.
|
available in some repository that is not offline.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This would avoid the question of what to do with onlyingroup when a
|
This would avoid the question of what to do with onlyingroup when a
|
||||||
|
@ -17,4 +17,6 @@ repository is in the specified group but also another one.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I really don't like the `copies=!offline:1` syntax though. (I already
|
I really don't like the `copies=!offline:1` syntax though. (I already
|
||||||
disliked copies=group:n` and this takes it in an even worse direction.)
|
disliked copies=group:n` and this takes it in an even worse direction.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So while this is more generic, I kind of prefer the onlyingroup name..
|
||||||
"""]]
|
"""]]
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue