From a0e59c1d178511507b2baa8bf301af75873ae931 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:35:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ..._7f3db7b5a47c3021f82a49024a8c7e43._comment | 33 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/annex_merge__breaks_git_repository__33__/comment_7_7f3db7b5a47c3021f82a49024a8c7e43._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/annex_merge__breaks_git_repository__33__/comment_7_7f3db7b5a47c3021f82a49024a8c7e43._comment b/doc/bugs/annex_merge__breaks_git_repository__33__/comment_7_7f3db7b5a47c3021f82a49024a8c7e43._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..87fdabd944 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/annex_merge__breaks_git_repository__33__/comment_7_7f3db7b5a47c3021f82a49024a8c7e43._comment @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 7""" + date="2024-06-04T15:15:36Z" + content=""" +Decoding the export.log, we have these events: + +Tue Aug 4 13:44:10 2020 (PST): An export is run on an openneuro worker +sending to `s3-PRIVATE`, of b78b723042e6d7a967c806b52258e8554caa1696 which +is now lost to history. After that export completed, there was a subsequent +started but not completed export of +ae2937297eb1b4f6c9bfdfcf9d7a41b1adcea32e, also lost to history. + +Fri Jan 19 21:04:26 2024: An export run on the same worker, sending to +a `s3-PUBLIC` (not the current one, one that has been marked dead and +forgotten), of ae2937297eb1b4f6c9bfdfcf9d7a41b1adcea32e. After that export +completed, there was a subsequent started but not completed export of +28b655e8207f916122bbcbd22c0369d86bb4ffc1. + +Later the same day, an export run on the same worker, sending to +`s3-PUBLIC` (the current one), of 28b655e8207f916122bbcbd22c0369d86bb4ffc1. +This export completed. + +Interesting that two exports were apparently started but left incomplete. +This could have been because git-annex was interrupted, which would go a +way toward confirming my analysis of this bug. But also possible +there was a error exporting one or more files. + +According to Nell, the git history of main was rewritten to remove a large +file from git. The tree 28b655e8207f916122bbcbd22c0369d86bb4ffc1 appears +to still contain the large binary file. No commit in main references it. +It did get grafted into the git-annex branch which is why it was not lost. +"""]]