Added a comment: use cost then?
This commit is contained in:
parent
add655fc6f
commit
9f55cfc661
1 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="anarcat"
|
||||||
|
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/4ad594c1e13211c1ad9edb81ce5110b7"
|
||||||
|
subject="use cost then?"
|
||||||
|
date="2019-02-07T20:19:13Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
So I guess the answer here is to use \"cost\" to prioritize \"LAN-local\" repositories? Then we hit [[bugs/assistant_does_not_always_use_repo_cost_info_when_queueing_downloads]] but at least it will work in the general case...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I think that, in my case, it means doing:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
git config remote.origin.annex-cost 150
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
... so that it's somewhere between local repositories (100) and remote (200). Would that solve my issue here? I don't have many files to transfer right now so I can't really test this until I import new photos, but I'll give it a shot! :)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It would certainly be nice if git-annex was a little more clever with this - it could, for example, have a gray zone between \"remote\" and \"local\"... but I guess that's what the `annex-cost-command` is for...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thanks!
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue