From 9f045ed494917734bb183c46c65ef0e2990bb46b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bpoldrack Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:23:57 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_2_85483ca3d6d913bc23f23e5faef278d4._comment | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/use_copy__95__file__95__range_for_get_and_copy/comment_2_85483ca3d6d913bc23f23e5faef278d4._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/use_copy__95__file__95__range_for_get_and_copy/comment_2_85483ca3d6d913bc23f23e5faef278d4._comment b/doc/todo/use_copy__95__file__95__range_for_get_and_copy/comment_2_85483ca3d6d913bc23f23e5faef278d4._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3e38807ee8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/use_copy__95__file__95__range_for_get_and_copy/comment_2_85483ca3d6d913bc23f23e5faef278d4._comment @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="bpoldrack" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/8e929a6e60f16f50e7463f88aab26f40" + subject="comment 2" + date="2025-03-05T14:23:56Z" + content=""" +The problem is indeed specific to the combination of NFS and ZFS. +Not sure how to properly probe for that. But since this is relevant only for copies across ZFS over NFS4.2 mounts, a config option would be OK, I think. It's not that something isn't working w/o it, it's just unnecessarily slow. +"""]]