This commit is contained in:
parent
7bf6e1df8a
commit
9dc118d201
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ When I run git-annex whereused --key <keyname>, nothing comes up. But if I look
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If I add --historical, I can see the file exists in some previous commit that I thought had been successfully merged, and moved on from. It seems like this might be related to export trees, because that keyword is also present in the output with --historical
|
If I add --historical, I can see the file exists in some previous commit that I thought had been successfully merged, and moved on from. It seems like this might be related to export trees, because that keyword is also present in the output with --historical
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[[!format sh """
|
```
|
||||||
$ git-annex whereused --key SHA256E-s1000013--e435522a9059bcb086b6db5fa5f05a06913266772a7931eefae2b8f7647f5f14.JPG
|
$ git-annex whereused --key SHA256E-s1000013--e435522a9059bcb086b6db5fa5f05a06913266772a7931eefae2b8f7647f5f14.JPG
|
||||||
$ git-annex whereused --historical --key SHA256E-s1000013--e435522a9059bcb086b6db5fa5f05a06913266772a7931eefae2b8f7647f5f14.JPG
|
$ git-annex whereused --historical --key SHA256E-s1000013--e435522a9059bcb086b6db5fa5f05a06913266772a7931eefae2b8f7647f5f14.JPG
|
||||||
SHA256E-s1000013--e435522a9059bcb086b6db5fa5f05a06913266772a7931eefae2b8f7647f5f14.JPG remotes/origin/git-annex~12:export.tree/2010-08-21/042.JPG
|
SHA256E-s1000013--e435522a9059bcb086b6db5fa5f05a06913266772a7931eefae2b8f7647f5f14.JPG remotes/origin/git-annex~12:export.tree/2010-08-21/042.JPG
|
||||||
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ lrwxrwxrwx 1 shaddy shaddy 201 May 20 2024 2010-08-21/042.JPG -> ../.git/annex/
|
||||||
$ ls -lL 2010-08-21/042.JPG
|
$ ls -lL 2010-08-21/042.JPG
|
||||||
-r--r--r-- 1 shaddy shaddy 1000013 May 21 2024 2010-08-21/042.JPG
|
-r--r--r-- 1 shaddy shaddy 1000013 May 21 2024 2010-08-21/042.JPG
|
||||||
$
|
$
|
||||||
"""]]
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
My reading of the documentation is that the file being present in the local annex shouldn't require the --historical argument, which is much slower.
|
My reading of the documentation is that the file being present in the local annex shouldn't require the --historical argument, which is much slower.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue