From 9dbbb79f72cd380236671a94db0554f3b534f7a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:05:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...mment_1_487bf264afeef2a3b0a61d306ebfc3c5._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/webdav_fails___40__server:_radicale_0.9-1__41__/comment_1_487bf264afeef2a3b0a61d306ebfc3c5._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/webdav_fails___40__server:_radicale_0.9-1__41__/comment_1_487bf264afeef2a3b0a61d306ebfc3c5._comment b/doc/bugs/webdav_fails___40__server:_radicale_0.9-1__41__/comment_1_487bf264afeef2a3b0a61d306ebfc3c5._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..56e34a09d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/webdav_fails___40__server:_radicale_0.9-1__41__/comment_1_487bf264afeef2a3b0a61d306ebfc3c5._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2014-12-02T19:02:10Z" + content=""" +The webdav server seems to have rejected the MKCOL command, +which makes a collection (subdirectory) on the server. + +Is radicale intended to be a general-purpose webdav server? +The description of the debian package says it's a CalDAV and CardDAV +server. Perhaps it simply doesn't support generic top-level collections. +"""]]