Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com
This commit is contained in:
commit
9d7b35f7ad
3 changed files with 34 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnpdM9F8VbtQ_H5PaPMpGSxPe_d5L1eJ6w"
|
||||
nickname="Rafaël"
|
||||
subject="comment 1"
|
||||
date="2011-07-04T16:57:25Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
You convince me for unannex, but isn't the goal of uninit to revert all annex operations? In the current state, a clean revert is not possible (because of the broken symlinks after uninit). Instead of copying, using hard links is out of question?
|
||||
|
||||
For my needs, is the command \"git annex unlock .\" (from the root of the repo) a correct workaround?
|
||||
"""]]
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="http://ertai.myopenid.com/"
|
||||
nickname="npouillard"
|
||||
subject="git annex fsck --from remote"
|
||||
date="2011-06-25T16:20:44Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
Currently fsck silently ignores --to/--from.
|
||||
It should at least complain if it is not supported.
|
||||
"""]]
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="http://christian.amsuess.com/chrysn"
|
||||
nickname="chrysn"
|
||||
subject="filtering based on git-commits"
|
||||
date="2011-06-23T13:56:35Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
additional filter criteria could come from the git history:
|
||||
|
||||
* `git annex get --touched-in HEAD~5..` to fetch what has recently been worked on
|
||||
* `git annex get --touched-by chrysn --touched-in version-1.0..HEAD` to fetch what i've been workin on recently (based on regexp or substring match in author; git experts could probably craft much more meaningful expressions)
|
||||
|
||||
these options could also apply to `git annex find` -- actually, looking at the normal file system tools for such tasks, that might even be sufficient (think `git annex find --numcopies-gt 3 --present-on lanserver1 --drop` like `find -iname '*foo*' -delete`
|
||||
|
||||
(i was about to open a new forum discussion for commit-based getting, but this is close enough to be usefully joint in a discussion)
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue