mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: +may be "byte-target" field? ;)

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4 2016-09-24 02:43:22 +00:00 • committed by admin
parent bf1ef56fb9
commit 9c651b9608
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/todo/interface_to_the___34__progress__34___of_annex_operations/comment_6_25f9cd3d341c60a059f462a34c89d1d6._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4"
subject="+may be "byte-target" field? ;)"
date="2016-09-24T02:43:21Z"
content="""
THANK YOU for implementing this feature -- we will make use of it soon.
But so we don't do reverse estimation from \"byte-progress\" and \"percent-progress\", and didn't have to get it from a key (which might not have it e.g. in case of URL relaxed backend) -- could you just include in each record the \"byte-target\" (if known) or something like that? ;) thanks in advance!
"""]]