From b962c5dc89dd527f3aa973b31fd0fdb6fb5192f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://edheil.wordpress.com/" Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:53:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] --- doc/forum/switching_backends.mdwn | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/switching_backends.mdwn diff --git a/doc/forum/switching_backends.mdwn b/doc/forum/switching_backends.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..dedf1ffcba --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/switching_backends.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +so git annex migrate can switch a file from using one backend to the other. + +I've done that with a bunch of files. + +The old files should become "unused" right? But they don't seem to be. "git annex unused" still shows me only 2 unused files, and I've just migrated dozens of files from SHA256 to SHA256E. + +Is it possible they're still "used" by other repos? I have two other repos, one reached by SSH and one on a USB drive. Neither one of them is "bare." So maybe those files are still used by the "master" branches there, I thought... I went over and did "git annex sync" on each. Still my newly migrated files are not showing up as "unused." + +I'm worried that my repo is going to bloat with unused files with the SHA256 backend, which mysteriously do not show up as "unused" in git annex unused, if I migrate any more. + +any ideas what piece of the puzzle I could be missing here? + From 7f0e51e04df052b12d4176d1d7c84613149900ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://edheil.wordpress.com/" Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:20:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Added a comment --- ...comment_1_ecf4109c1148dafde3519243ae3c5a03._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/switching_backends/comment_1_ecf4109c1148dafde3519243ae3c5a03._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/switching_backends/comment_1_ecf4109c1148dafde3519243ae3c5a03._comment b/doc/forum/switching_backends/comment_1_ecf4109c1148dafde3519243ae3c5a03._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..29bc9f9c3f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/switching_backends/comment_1_ecf4109c1148dafde3519243ae3c5a03._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://edheil.wordpress.com/" + ip="99.54.57.201" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-01-28T03:20:38Z" + content=""" +Just noticed this -- http://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/git_annex_migrate_leaves_old_backend_versions_around/ + +so I don't need to worry about disk space bloat; they're all just hardlinks. That's cool. Still would be nice to know why they don't show up as \"unused.\" But not as important. +"""]] From 224cb11e0a732560468111bc155f454cacbaf653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl1D_4vD5ueaDw8gRsIYPO3UHRKEpFfg9I" <@web> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:36:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] poll vote (My phone (or MP3 player)) --- doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn b/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn index 831f843e50..0247b93aa3 100644 --- a/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn +++ b/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ locally paired systems, and remote servers with rsync. Help me prioritize my work: What special remote would you most like to use with the git-annex assistant? -[[!poll open=yes 15 "Amazon S3 (done)" 12 "Amazon Glacier (done)" 9 "Box.com (done)" 67 "My phone (or MP3 player)" 18 "Tahoe-LAFS" 6 "OpenStack SWIFT" 25 "Google Drive"]] +[[!poll open=yes 15 "Amazon S3 (done)" 12 "Amazon Glacier (done)" 9 "Box.com (done)" 68 "My phone (or MP3 player)" 18 "Tahoe-LAFS" 6 "OpenStack SWIFT" 25 "Google Drive"]] This poll is ordered with the options I consider easiest to build listed first. Mostly because git-annex already supports them and they