From 9bb93e2129da5cfce74a89c80460a906a6936c64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: openmedi Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:35:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment b/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..46be89f739 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="openmedi" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/563ffaff3b492c579bd8f094472e4506" + subject="comment 1" + date="2017-02-25T20:35:52Z" + content=""" +I think you could add those two repositories as remotes of each other and merge them with the `--allow-unrelated-histories` option. But I'm not sure if this is a good idea, or not. But some googling in that direction might yield some useful information. Good luck! +"""]]