Added a comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
9467cfa9bc
commit
9b5763527b
1 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="mbroadhead"
|
||||||
|
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f3d801c0c943caab1152c4ebe8c99d51"
|
||||||
|
subject="comment 3"
|
||||||
|
date="2017-03-02T22:48:08Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
Thanks for the insight.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The `git stash` solution works assuming you are either:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
a. Going to keep it in your stash forever
|
||||||
|
b. You are going to commit your stash eventually
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I think there are situations where I want to completely abort a commit and not have to worry about it biting me down the road.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
IMO from a end user perspective I think the best solution would be to have data only count as duplicate if it has a reachable file in your annex for options `--deduplicate`, `--clean-duplicates` and `--skip-duplicates` of `git annex import`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
What would be the downside to this?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Worst case scenario this re-wires up some symlinks to once dangling git objects. They still aren't duplicates, there will only be one symlink per formerly dangling git object. This seems better than data loss.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thoughts?
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue