mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
gernot 2011-04-24 11:20:06 +00:00 • committed by admin
commit 9715f3132c
1 changed files with 16 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
doc/forum/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_2_eec848fcf3979c03cbff2b7407c75a7a._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="gernot"
ip="87.79.209.169"
subject="comment 2"
date="2011-04-24T11:20:05Z"
content="""
Right, I have thought about untrusting all but a few remotes to achieve
something similar before and I'm sure it would kind of work. It would be more
of an ugly workaround, however, because I would have to untrust remotes that
are, in reality, at least semi-trusted. That's why an extra option/attribute
for that kind of purpose/remote would be nice.
Obviously I didn't see the scalability problem though. Good Point. Maybe I can
achieve the same thing by writing a log parsing script for myself?
"""]]