From 968bac2c149b2f65226fc8565d757c16dd8df6c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: msz Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:56:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_5_e3c67afcb36ba91a31de740b3dd02ba3._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/encrypt_just_the_annex_on_git+annex_hosting_site/comment_5_e3c67afcb36ba91a31de740b3dd02ba3._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/encrypt_just_the_annex_on_git+annex_hosting_site/comment_5_e3c67afcb36ba91a31de740b3dd02ba3._comment b/doc/todo/encrypt_just_the_annex_on_git+annex_hosting_site/comment_5_e3c67afcb36ba91a31de740b3dd02ba3._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7e7383dbea --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/encrypt_just_the_annex_on_git+annex_hosting_site/comment_5_e3c67afcb36ba91a31de740b3dd02ba3._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="msz" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6e8b88e7c70d86f4cfd27d450958aed4" + subject="comment 5" + date="2025-04-10T16:56:50Z" + content=""" +Thank you, this is very informative! + +Could such a special remote use the same \"transport\" as the underlying remote (thinking of p2p http in particular), which would mean the same authentication & the same set of permissions server side? +"""]]