From 92456b2d69535b81826f524e0a29ffcca6f9140f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 16:45:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...mment_1_f6434400d528a0fa59c056995ff2e6f3._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/transferkey_fails_due_to_gpg/comment_1_f6434400d528a0fa59c056995ff2e6f3._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/transferkey_fails_due_to_gpg/comment_1_f6434400d528a0fa59c056995ff2e6f3._comment b/doc/bugs/transferkey_fails_due_to_gpg/comment_1_f6434400d528a0fa59c056995ff2e6f3._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..1fb9d2a0b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/transferkey_fails_due_to_gpg/comment_1_f6434400d528a0fa59c056995ff2e6f3._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="4.153.8.30" + subject="comment 1" + date="2012-09-09T16:45:20Z" + content=""" +This is very strange behavior for gpg, it's being told several ways not to be interactive (--batch, --no-tty, --passphrase-fd); the mode it's being run in should, even without those options, only prompt for a password. + +I'm left wondering what settings you have in gpg.conf, and even wondering if you have some kind of wrapper around gpg that makes it more interactive, or some odd gpg agent that's interactive, or something. + +(I'm also confused that you mention a \"gpg>\" prompt, but your transcript doesn't show one.) +"""]]