From 8b47a19b778aeed3515c21cbb37eb895f97b34d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:31:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_5_e884c001a556a0c693d1cc9a97c068ac._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Slightly_finer_control_over_file_whereabouts/comment_5_e884c001a556a0c693d1cc9a97c068ac._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Slightly_finer_control_over_file_whereabouts/comment_5_e884c001a556a0c693d1cc9a97c068ac._comment b/doc/forum/Slightly_finer_control_over_file_whereabouts/comment_5_e884c001a556a0c693d1cc9a97c068ac._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..50e5cf9afe --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Slightly_finer_control_over_file_whereabouts/comment_5_e884c001a556a0c693d1cc9a97c068ac._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="2001:4830:1600:187::2" + subject="comment 5" + date="2013-09-20T15:31:18Z" + content=""" +Ok. This seems to be a bug in git-annex then. While it's surprisingly difficult to do so, it tries to interpet preferred content expressions in a stable way -- that is, they should not want to get a file when it's missing and then want to drop it when it's present. +"""]]