TransferScanner design thoughts
This commit is contained in:
parent
345806b2dd
commit
892f1e6abe
1 changed files with 46 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -3,16 +3,55 @@ all the other git clones, at both the git level and the key/value level.
|
|||
|
||||
## immediate action items
|
||||
|
||||
* At startup, and possibly periodically, look for files we have that
|
||||
location tracking indicates remotes do not, and enqueue Uploads for
|
||||
them. Also, enqueue Downloads for any files we're missing.
|
||||
* At startup, and possibly periodically, or when the network connection
|
||||
changes, or some heuristic suggests that a remote was disconnected from
|
||||
us for a while, queue remotes for processing by the TransferScanner,
|
||||
to queue Transfers of files it or we're missing.
|
||||
* After git sync, identify content that we don't have that is now available
|
||||
on remotes, and transfer. But first, need to ensure that when a remote
|
||||
on remotes, and transfer. (Needed when we have a uni-directional connection
|
||||
to a remote, so it won't be uploading content to us.)
|
||||
But first, need to ensure that when a remote
|
||||
receives content, and updates its location log, it syncs that update
|
||||
out.
|
||||
* When MountWatcher detects a newly mounted drive, rescan git remotes
|
||||
in order to get ones on the drive, and do a git sync and file transfers
|
||||
to sync any repositories on it.
|
||||
|
||||
## TransferScanner
|
||||
|
||||
The TransferScanner thread needs to find keys that need to be Uploaded
|
||||
to a remote, or Downloaded from it.
|
||||
|
||||
How to find the keys to transfer? I'd like to avoid potentially
|
||||
expensive traversals of the whole git working copy if I can.
|
||||
|
||||
One way would be to do a git diff between the (unmerged) git-annex branches
|
||||
of the git repo, and its remote. Parse that for lines that add a key to
|
||||
either, and queue transfers. That should work fairly efficiently when the
|
||||
remote is a git repository. Indeed, git-annex already does such a diff
|
||||
when it's doing a union merge of data into the git-annex branch. It
|
||||
might even be possible to have the union merge and scan use the same
|
||||
git diff data.
|
||||
|
||||
But that approach has several problems:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The list of keys it would generate wouldn't have associated git
|
||||
filenames, so the UI couldn't show the user what files were being
|
||||
transferred.
|
||||
2. Worse, without filenames, any later features to exclude
|
||||
files/directories from being transferred wouldn't work.
|
||||
3. Looking at a git diff of the git-annex branches would find keys
|
||||
that were added to either side while the two repos were disconnected.
|
||||
But if the two repos' keys were not fully in sync before they
|
||||
disconnected (which is quite possible; transfers could be incomplete),
|
||||
the diff would not show those older out of sync keys.
|
||||
|
||||
The remote could also be a special remote. In this case, I have to either
|
||||
traverse the git working copy, or perhaps traverse the whole git-annex
|
||||
branch (which would have the same problems with filesnames not being
|
||||
available).
|
||||
|
||||
If a traversal is done, should check all remotes, not just
|
||||
one. Probably worth handling the case where a remote is connected
|
||||
while in the middle of such a scan, so part of the scan needs to be
|
||||
redone to check it.
|
||||
|
||||
## longer-term TODO
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue