response
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a2100b250
commit
8912e1b96f
1 changed files with 16 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
|
|||
What steps will reproduce the problem?
|
||||
|
||||
As described in http://git-annex.branchable.com/backends/#comment-3c1cd45d2a015b4fc412dd813293ad7d , sha512 is faster. On my 64-bit system, the speed difference is about 1.5times.
|
||||
As described in
|
||||
http://git-annex.branchable.com/backends/#comment-3c1cd45d2a015b4fc412dd813293ad7d
|
||||
, sha512 is faster. On my 64-bit system, the speed difference is about
|
||||
1.5times.
|
||||
|
||||
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -10,4 +13,15 @@ What version of git-annex are you using? On what operating system?
|
|||
|
||||
Please provide any additional information below.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> You are free to change the default in your own annexes. This is very easy
|
||||
> to do: `echo '* annex.backend=SHA512E' > .gitattributes`
|
||||
>
|
||||
> I don't anticipate moving to SHA512, because
|
||||
>
|
||||
> 1. It makes `ls -l` really ugly. Each symlink takes like 4 lines
|
||||
> on an 80 column terminal.
|
||||
> 2. There are better hashes coming. Particularly SHA3. That should be
|
||||
> faster and/or more secure. And without adding so much length to the
|
||||
> hash.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue