mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Cebtenzzre 2020-11-22 16:07:16 +00:00 • committed by admin
parent c724adfb48
commit 8816f0d8ab
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/todo/does_not_preserve_timestamps/comment_12_a8b69299c9278c16c6c5061d88bc7eca._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="Cebtenzzre"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/238202b8214db86e24636e11f4452a12"
subject="comment 12"
date="2020-11-22T16:07:15Z"
content="""
The semantics described in [proposal for timestamp semantics](https://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/proposal_for_timestamp_semantics/) would be all I need to stop wishing I just used rsync instead of git-annex. It seems easier to track history with rsync (snapshots and a CHANGELOG?) than to synchronize timestamps (or xattrs for comments) with git-annex. I don't care if it impacts performance, or if I have to set flags to non-default values, or how it resolves conflicts. I know git doesn't do it natively, but I thought the point of git-annex was to be better than native git with data files. Metadata like this is very useful to me, and often I want to sort by *some* kind of meaningful timestamp. ls can't read Exif or ID3 tags, and sometimes they aren't available or even relevant.
"""]]