From 8716bd2ded65d863a40f4820d14a3a5bb6046327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nadir Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 18:56:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...t_3_de92ff891493737021cb264394a0a6bb._comment | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Can_you_use_git_annex_on_gocryptfs__63__/comment_3_de92ff891493737021cb264394a0a6bb._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Can_you_use_git_annex_on_gocryptfs__63__/comment_3_de92ff891493737021cb264394a0a6bb._comment b/doc/forum/Can_you_use_git_annex_on_gocryptfs__63__/comment_3_de92ff891493737021cb264394a0a6bb._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..efbebb26f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Can_you_use_git_annex_on_gocryptfs__63__/comment_3_de92ff891493737021cb264394a0a6bb._comment @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="nadir" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/2af9174cf6c06de802104d632dc40071" + subject="comment 3" + date="2023-02-24T18:56:40Z" + content=""" +Sorry, didn't see you guys answered. + +I've tried the \"noatime\" mount option, but no change. + +I think joey might be on to something. As far as I understand [this github issue](https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/606), there could be something to this. + +I guess the only remaining solution would be something like Veracrypt. What a pity. + +Thank you for your help. +"""]]