v3 is now faster than v2
Rebenchmarked v2 vs v3, and v3 is now actually faster. Yes, storing data in git, using git as a filesystem is actually faster than just using the filesystem. If you do it just right. :)
This commit is contained in:
parent
2cda9d0a0f
commit
8562e6096c
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
9
debian/changelog
vendored
9
debian/changelog
vendored
|
@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
|
|||
git-annex (3.20110625) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
|
||||
|
||||
* Sped back up fsck, copy --from, and other commands that often
|
||||
have to read a lot of information from the git-annex branch. Such
|
||||
commands are now faster than they were before introduction of the
|
||||
git-annex branch.
|
||||
* Always ensure git-annex branch exists.
|
||||
* Modify location log parser to allow future expansion.
|
||||
* --force will cause add, etc, to operate on ignored files.
|
||||
* Sped back up fsck, copy --from, and other commands that often
|
||||
have to read a lot of information from the git-annex branch. Should
|
||||
now be nearly as fast as before the branch was introduced.
|
||||
* Fix encoding of utf-8 etc when storing the description of repository
|
||||
* Avoid mangling encoding when storing the description of repository
|
||||
and other content.
|
||||
|
||||
-- Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:01:06 -0400
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue