From 7ea9f52c2859a72f8e46522338c1c8a112549d84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:37:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] cannot be broken symlinks after all.. one other idea --- ...ex_unused_seems_to_check_for_current_path.mdwn | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_seems_to_check_for_current_path.mdwn b/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_seems_to_check_for_current_path.mdwn index ff318d616e..df0fb50cc1 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_seems_to_check_for_current_path.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_seems_to_check_for_current_path.mdwn @@ -25,8 +25,13 @@ I am using git-annex version 836e71297b8e3b5bd6f89f7eb1198f59af985b0b > But, git annex unused absolutely does not let the current directory > influence what it does. It always scans the entire repo from the top. > And I've tested it just now to make sure that in a subdirectory -> it does the same thing as at the top. The only way I could explain -> what you show above is if "Software" were a separate git repository -> than "~/annex". Or if the symlinks to the content are somehow broken -> when looked at from within Software, but unbroken when looked at from the -> parent directory. I can't think how that would happen. --[[Joey]] +> it does the same thing as at the top. +> +> There are only two ways this could happen that I can think of: +> +> 1. If "Software" were a separate git repository than "~/annex". +> 2. If gitignores or something made `git ls-files` +> not list the files when ran in the subdir. This seems *possible*, +> but I don't know how to construct such an ignore. +> +> --[[Joey]]