mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
gb@4a49bb1afcf3d183bba8f07297b0395808768c6c 2020-08-31 14:46:21 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 358a20c5a0
commit 778e103632
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
doc/forum/Hardlinks_instead_of_symlinks_in_locked+thin_mode.mdwn
View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Would it be possible to make `thin` work in locked mode? In other words, could locked mode use **hardlinks** instead symlinks then `thin` is set?
Would it be possible to make `thin` work in locked mode? In other words, could locked mode use **hardlinks** instead of symlinks then `thin` is set?
Such a combined mode would have all the benefits of locked mode (protection, easy-to-stop missing files) and of direct mode (no duplication of files). It would also (partially) solve the problems discussed in [[devblog/day_601__v7_default/]] and [[todo/symlinks_for_not-present_unlocked_files/]].
Such a combined mode would have all the benefits of locked mode (protection, easy-to-spot missing files) and of direct mode (no duplication of files). It would also (partially) solve the problems discussed in [[devblog/day_601__v7_default/]] and [[todo/symlinks_for_not-present_unlocked_files/]].
Here is an example of how this could work from the user prospective: